<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
    <author>ENA</author>
    <category>Sectors</category>
    <date>2024-03-26 16:10:59</date>
    <fulldesc>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mumbai, Mar 26 (KNN)&lt;/strong&gt; In an important ruling regarding stays on arbitral awards, the Bombay High Court has held that where an arbitral award is in the nature of a money decree, the party seeking a stay must deposit 100 per cent of the awarded amount.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The single judge bench of Justice R.I. Chagla rejected arguments that a bank guarantee should suffice, stating there is no distinction between the parameters for granting stays under Sections 36(3) and 37 of the Arbitration Act.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;As per Section 36 of the Arbitration Act read with Order 41 Rules 1 and 5 of the Civil Procedure Code, courts have the discretion to consider the specific facts and circumstances of each case when deciding whether to grant a stay on the execution of a decree.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The court can direct the party seeking the stay to deposit either the full decretal amount or a certain percentage of it. However, the general practice is to grant stays on the execution of money decrees only in exceptional circumstances.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The case, titled M/s. Balmer Lawrie &amp;amp; Co.Ltd vs M/s. Shilpi Engineering Pvt.Ltd, arose from an interim application filed by a party seeking to recall an earlier order disposing of their notice of motion for stay on enforcement of an arbitral award dated July 5, 2018.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The applicant argued that since they had furnished a bank guarantee for the entire awarded amount before the Calcutta High Court, a liberal interpretation should be taken.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;However, Justice Chagla noted that Supreme Court precedents consistently require deposit of the full awarded amount when the award is a money decree. The court held that Section 36(3) does not warrant a liberal interpretation when imposing conditions for staying an award's operation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Differing from a Calcutta High Court judgment that distinguished between Sections 36(3) and 37, the Bombay High Court ruled that the same standards apply irrespective of whether a Section 34 petition to set aside the award is pending or dismissed.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Ultimately, while granting a conditional stay, the court directed the applicant to deposit the awarded amount with interest within six weeks, allowing the respondent to apply for withdrawal of the sum upon such deposit.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The ruling reinforces the need for successful parties to secure the awarded amount before obtaining a stay on execution of arbitral awards adjudging monetary claims.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(KNN Bureau)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
</fulldesc>
    <id>37161</id>
    <link>https://knnindia.co.in/news/newsdetails/sectors/bombay-hc-rules-100-deposit-required-for-staying-monetary-arbitral-awards</link>
    <pubDate>2024-03-26 16:10:59</pubDate>
    <source>knnindia.co.in</source>
    <title>Bombay HC Rules 100% Deposit Required For Staying Monetary Arbitral Awards</title>
</root>
