<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
    <author>ENA</author>
    <category>State</category>
    <date>2025-01-13 14:16:50</date>
    <fulldesc>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Delhi, Jan 13 (KNN)&lt;/strong&gt; The Central government is assessing legal measures to address the implications of Karnatakas recently proposed taxes on mineral-bearing land and mineral rights.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;This follows concerns from the mining and steel sectors, reported The Economic Times.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;A high-level meeting, chaired by Union Heavy Industries Minister HD Kumaraswamy and Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal, took place in New Delhi on Thursday.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Officials and industry representatives discussed legislative options to mitigate the potential fallout of Karnatakas tax policy.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;In December 2024, the Karnataka Legislature passed the Karnataka (Mineral Rights and Mineral Bearing Land) Tax Bill, which is pending gubernatorial approval. The Bill introduces significant levies on mineral rights, sparking criticism from industry leaders.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Minister Kumaraswamy called the taxes steep, arguing that such measures could destabilise Indias steel industry and compromise the nations self-reliance vision under Atma Nirbhar Bharat.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;He warned that emulating Karnatakas approach could lead to increased steel imports, threatening Indias target of producing 300 million tonnes of steel annually by 2030.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The Bill proposes varying tax rates by mineral type, with levies expected to generate Rs 4,714 crore annually. Critics argue the taxes are three times higher than those in other states, potentially hampering mining operations.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The Supreme Courts August 2024 ruling upheld states authority to impose taxes on mineral-bearing land, reversing a 1989 decision.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;It also allowed retrospective taxation from April 1, 2005, while permitting payment of dues over 12 years starting 2026.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The mining and steel industries fear that Karnatakas taxes could set a precedent, impacting the sectors competitiveness.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Participants in Thursdays meeting highlighted that such measures could derail economic goals, including surging steel demand projected at 280 million tonnes by 2030.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The Centres legal review underscores the complexity of balancing states fiscal autonomy with national industrial priorities.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The issue now awaits further deliberations as the Centre seeks to align state-level taxation with broader economic objectives.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;(KNN Bureau)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
</fulldesc>
    <id>40621</id>
    <link>https://knnindia.co.in/news/newsdetails/state/center-explores-legal-remedy-to-counter-karnatakas-proposed-mineral-levies</link>
    <pubDate>2025-01-13 14:16:50</pubDate>
    <source>knnindia.co.in</source>
    <title>Center Explores Legal Remedy To Counter Karnataka's Proposed Mineral Levies</title>
</root>
