<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
    <author>ENA</author>
    <category>State</category>
    <date>2025-07-02 16:02:13</date>
    <fulldesc>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Delhi, Jul 2 (KNN) &lt;/strong&gt;The Delhi High Court has breathed new life into Crocs Inc.'s legal battle against several Indian footwear companies for allegedly copying its signature foam clog design.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The court overturned a 2019 ruling that had dismissed Crocs' cases and ordered the lawsuits to be reconsidered on their merits.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Crocs, the US-based footwear giant, had filed multiple suits against companies like Bata India, Relaxo, Liberty Shoes, Action, Aqualite, and Bioworld Merchandising.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The brand claimed these firms were imitating the distinctive shape and perforated look of its clogs, thereby misleading consumers and harming its brand reputation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;A division bench comprising Justices C. Hari Shankar and Ajay Digpaul ruled that the earlier dismissal by a single judge was legally flawed. They directed that the matter be sent back to a single-judge bench for a full hearing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Back in February 2019, the single judge had dismissed all six passing-off suits, arguing that Crocs was seeking continued trademark protection for a design that had only temporary protection under the Designs Act, 2000.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The court had also questioned the novelty of Crocs design, calling it a basic trade variant of a sandal and not worthy of exclusive rights.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;However, the division bench took a different view, stating that Crocs passing-off claims deserved a detailed review. The US firm maintains that its clog design qualifies for shape trademark protection, and that the alleged copying is misleading customers.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;In trademark law, passing off refers to the practice of one company imitating anothers branding or product look to gain unfair advantage, especially when the original product does not hold a registered trademark.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;(KNN Bureau)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
</fulldesc>
    <id>42662</id>
    <link>https://knnindia.co.in/news/newsdetails/state/delhi-high-court-revives-crocs-lawsuit-against-indian-footwear-brands-over-design-copying</link>
    <pubDate>2025-07-02 16:02:13</pubDate>
    <source>knnindia.co.in</source>
    <title>Delhi High Court Revives Crocs' Lawsuit Against Indian Footwear Brands Over Design Copying</title>
</root>
