<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
    <author>ENA</author>
    <category>Sectors</category>
    <date>2025-09-16 16:14:05</date>
    <fulldesc>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Delhi, Sep 16 (KNN)&lt;/strong&gt; The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has ruled that the distribution of amounts among financial creditors should be based on their security interest or on a pro-rata basis according to their voting share in the committee of creditors (CoC).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The bench, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Member-Technical), dismissed an appeal challenging the CoCs decision to distribute proceeds as per voting shares rather than security interest.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The judgment came in the case of Small Industries Development Bank of India v. Sumit Sharma, Erstwhile RP &amp;amp; Anr. (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1359 of 2025 &amp;amp; I.A. No. 5309 of 2025).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The appellant, holding a 3.22% vote share in the CoC, contended that it was a secured financial creditor and therefore entitled to distribution based on its security interest.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;In contrast, Punjab National Bank, which held 96.68% of the voting share, supported the CoCs resolution for distribution on the basis of voting share.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Earlier, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Jaipur, had approved the resolution plan of the corporate debtor on 12 March 2024. Following this, the CoC passed a resolution on distribution based on vote share.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The appellant filed I.A. 637/JPR/2023 seeking to set aside this CoC resolution, but the NCLT dismissed the plea. The appellant then approached the NCLAT.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;While rejecting the appeal, the NCLAT observed that the CoC had duly adopted the voting share mechanism and that the appellants objection was pending even as the resolution plan was approved.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The bench also cited the rulings in State Bank of India v. IDBI Bank Limited &amp;amp; Anr. (Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 321/2024) and India Resurgence ARC Pvt. Ltd. v. Amit Metalinks Ltd. &amp;amp; Anr. (2021) 19 SCC 672, affirming that distribution must follow the CoCs commercial decision.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;With these observations, the NCLAT upheld the CoCs distribution mechanism and dismissed the appeal.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;(KNN Bureau)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
</fulldesc>
    <id>43512</id>
    <link>https://knnindia.co.in/news/newsdetails/sectors/nclat-upholds-cocs-decision-to-distribute-proceeds-based-on-voting-share-rather-than-security-interest</link>
    <pubDate>2025-09-16 16:14:05</pubDate>
    <source>knnindia.co.in</source>
    <title>NCLAT Upholds CoC’s Decision to Distribute Proceeds Based on Voting Share Rather Than Security Interest</title>
</root>
