<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
    <author>ENA</author>
    <category>Sectors</category>
    <date>2025-12-11 17:16:29</date>
    <fulldesc>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Delhi, Dec 11 (KNN)&lt;/strong&gt; The Supreme Court, on December 10, clarified the interpretation of Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that once the statutory 18-month period for delivering an arbitral award expires, the original arbitrators mandate automatically terminates if no application for an extension is filed.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Accordingly, any further extension granted by the Court requires the appointment of a substituted arbitrator under Section 29A(6) of the Act.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Key Findings of the Court&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;A bench comprising Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Alok Aradhe heard an appeal against a Delhi High Court order, which had declined substitution of a sole arbitrator while extending the arbitrators mandate for an additional four months.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court observed that the sole arbitrator was required under Section 29A(1) to pass an award within one year from March 1, 2022, i.e., by February 28, 2023. Since no extension application was filed, the arbitrators mandate ceased to exist under Section 29A(4), rendering the arbitrator functus officio.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;While acknowledging precedent from Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Berger Paints India Ltd., which allowed extension even after expiry of the period, the Court emphasised that continuation of the original arbitrator is impermissible after the mandate has expired. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Section 29A(6) therefore obligates the Court to appoint a substituted arbitrator to ensure expeditious resolution of disputes.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Outcome and Orders&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Setting aside the Delhi High Courts order, the Supreme Court appointed Justice Najmi Waziri, Former Judge of Delhi High Court, as the substituted sole arbitrator. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The Court directed that the arbitration proceedings resume from the stage already attained and be concluded within six months from the date of receipt of the order.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;(KNN Bureau)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
</fulldesc>
    <id>44384</id>
    <link>https://knnindia.co.in/news/newsdetails/sectors/supreme-court-rules-original-arbitrators-mandate-ceases-automatically-after-18-months-without-extension</link>
    <pubDate>2025-12-11 17:16:29</pubDate>
    <source>knnindia.co.in</source>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules Original Arbitrator’s Mandate Ceases Automatically After 18 Months Without Extension</title>
</root>
