<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
    <author>ENA</author>
    <category>Sectors</category>
    <date>2026-03-09 16:21:00</date>
    <fulldesc>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Delhi, Mar 9 (KNN)&lt;/strong&gt; The Supreme Court has ruled that an arbitral tribunal cannot grant pre-award or pendente lite interest as compensation if the underlying contract expressly prohibits such payments.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;This decision could have implications for MSMEs, which often rely on arbitration to recover delayed payments. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;If contracts bar pendente lite interest, smaller firms may not be able to claim compensation for financing costs during disputes, potentially increasing financial strain&amp;mdash;particularly in public sector projects where such clauses are common.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Vipul M. Pancholi set aside part of a ruling by the Allahabad High Court that had upheld the award of pre-award interest.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Referring to Sections 37(1)(a) and 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court held that granting pre-award interest is not mandatory and must comply with contractual terms.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Dispute Linked to Railway Modernisation Project&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The case arose from a 2011 turnkey contract for the modernisation of the North Central Railway Jhansi Workshop, valued at about Rs 93.08 crore. After a reported 40-month delay, Larsen &amp;amp; Toubro initiated arbitration seeking payments, price variations and financing charges.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;In 2018, the arbitral tribunal awarded the company Rs 5.53 crore. Despite a clause in the General Conditions of Contract (GCC) prohibiting interest until the award date, the tribunal granted financing charges and interest-like amounts for certain claims by treating them as compensation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The award was later upheld by a commercial court and the Allahabad High Court, prompting the Union of India to appeal before the Supreme Court.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Court Allows Post-Award Interest&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Partly allowing the appeal, the Supreme Court ruled that the tribunal could not grant pre-award or pendente lite interest due to the contractual prohibition.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;However, it upheld the award of post-award interest, while reducing the rate from 12 per cent per annum to 8 per cent per annum from the date of the award until realisation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;(KNN Bureau)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
</fulldesc>
    <id>45397</id>
    <link>https://knnindia.co.in/news/newsdetails/sectors/sc-rules-no-pre-award-interest-if-contract-bars-it-raising-concerns-for-msme-payment-recovery</link>
    <pubDate>2026-03-09 16:21:00</pubDate>
    <source>knnindia.co.in</source>
    <title>SC Rules No Pre-Award Interest If Contract Bars It; Raising Concerns For MSME Payment Recovery</title>
</root>
